Back to Work is a hard book to excerpt, in the same way an informational but stylistically unexciting textbook might be. But there were a few passages that caught my eye. And since this is the season of giving, here they are! (with my de-politicianizing translations.)
“Our constitution was designed by people who were idealistic but not ideological. ย There’s a big difference. ย You can have a philosophy that tends to be liberal or conservative but still be open to evidence, experience, and argument. ย That enables people with honest differences to find practical, principled compromise. On the other hand, fervent insistence on ideology makes evidence, experience, and argument irrelevant: If you possess the absolute truth, those who disagree are by definition wrong, and evidence of success or failure is irrelevant. ย There is nothing to learn from the experience of other countries. Respectful arguments are a waste of time. Compromise is weakness. And if your policies fail, you don’t abandon them; instead you double down, asserting that they would have worked if only they had been carried to their logical extreme.”
Translation: Remember what it was like when Republicans knew words other than ‘no’? Hahahah me neither. Continue reading “From the Desk of Bill Clinton”
